I was in a band for about 8/9 years as many of you know. We're not "not a band" anymore, but since Brian moved 3 hours away and Adam's still finishing up his Master's, we have hardly anytime to meet up as a full group.
Regardless, I have been trying for about 8 months to find a new band. Many fruitless efforts through craigslist have dampened my spirits a bit, but I'm still hopeful.
Recently, I posted on craigslist, similar to how I've posted in previous attempts. In brief, the message was "I play guitar and bass, I'm looking for other musicians; I like Queens of the Stone Age, Dead Kennedys, Alice in Chains, etc." I got a few responses here and there - the typical problem is the bands or band members live too far from me or inconveniently out of the way (since I drive 80 miles a day to and from work, total).
But one response sounded intriguing. He said he loved that I liked the Dead Kennedys since he finds a lot of people online with really bad taste in music. I was hopeful because I figured "Great, someone likes the bands I do. Their band is bound to have a good sound." After saying how his band was the best thing since sliced bread, the only hip band in Connecticut, and the only band worth joining (modest he was) he sent me a link to his myspace.
Immediately, my hopes were dashed. If nothing else, the genres listed for his band included "indie" and "psychedelic," words that, in general, turn me off. To add insult to injury, the music was slow, dreadfully boring and he was among the poorer singers I've heard. I'm really not trying to bash his band or criticize, but when someone has the same musical interests and leads you to believe the band will sound as such, it's disappointing to hear a slow, psychedelic indie band with a kind of lame singer.
I emailed him back to let him know it wasn't really the sound I was looking for. He said I haven't heard his full set and I should really come to a practice to hear the full set. I apologized and said I wasn't interested and I couldn't imagine the music being too much different in person than on a myspace recording. I told him I was looking for a punk/grunge sound (and sent him a QOTSA song I really enjoy).
To quote his response:
"punk rock is an attitude not a sound but that is OK. Good luck and check out Public Image Ltd. Johnny Rotten's project after the Sex Pistols most punk rockers eventually grow up and so does the sound. Good Luck! CT music scene is a vast wasteland."
When it comes down to it, I'm probably the least punk person I know. I'll admit that. But I disagreed with his sentiment. Uppity punk 17 year olds will tell you as they smoke, give you the finger and say 'oi' that punk is an attitude. Fine. Let them be. But I've gotta say I'm pretty sure political lyrics, fast guitars and drums and typical crazy voices lead to punk more than strictly an "attitude." If Celine Dion got angry and sang angry political ballads...I'd doubt that she would suddenly be considered punk. (Most of all, I hate how the guy called it 'punk rock.') Mohawks and heroin do not alone constitute punk.
And he was also wrong. Well, most punk rockers do grow up (the ones who don't die) but their sound doesn't grow up. They become angry public speakers.
Saturday, April 26, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)